An outstanding and gripping revelation … essential reading

Impressively researched and engagingly written

A magnificent book … riveting

Powerful … engrossing … Taylor’s potent book shows why slavery took root as an essential part of British national life

Taylor can tell a story superbly and has a fine eye for detail … His argument is a potent and necessary corrective to a cosy national myth

Michael Taylor’s well-researched The Interest is … about abolition, but it focuses on the grandees who fought against it, mostly for reasons of greed … those seeking a catalogue of the country’s old iniquities need look no further

A thoroughly researched and potent historical account, The Interest exposes the truth behind the longstanding narrative of Britain as a leading abolitionist force and makes a powerful case for reparations

Scintillating … In twenty brisk, gripping chapters, Taylor charts the course from the foundation of the Anti-Slavery Society in 1823 to the final passage of the Slavery Abolition Act in 1833. Part of what makes this a compulsively readable book is his skill in cross-cutting between three groups of protagonists. On one track, we follow the abolitionist campaigners on their lengthy, uphill battle … This well-known story is reanimated by some brilliant pen-portraits … A second strand illuminates the fears and bigotries of white British West Indians … The main focus of the book, however, is on the colonists’ powerful domestic allies, the so-called West India Interest … Taylor paints a vivid picture of their outlook, organisation and superior political connections … As this timely, sobering book reminds us, British abolition cannot be celebrated as an inevitable or precocious national triumph. It was not the end, but only the beginning

One achievement of Taylor’s fascinating book is that, for the first time in a book about abolition, it gives equal weight to the force of pro-slavery … Taylor’s political analysis is first-rate and riveting … He argues that emancipation was neither inevitable nor altruistic; party politics in Westminster and rebellion from the West Indies played as much a role as moral outrage. Taylor’s achievement [is to] show that, thanks to the power of the Interest, being pro-slavery was seen as a respectable, even popular, position in British politics until the day of its demise. Above all, he reminds us of the role of those who have been unsung in this story – of Mary Prince, Samuel Sharpe and Quamina

Taylor superbly brings to life all the intrigue, machinations, heavy-lifting, rigmarole and chance of the tortuous path to abolition